Microservice architecture Vs monolithic architecture

Microservice architecture and monolithic architecture are two different approaches to software development.

Monolithic architecture is a traditional approach where the entire application is built as a single, self-contained unit. All the functionalities of the application are tightly integrated and dependent on each other. This approach can be simple to develop and deploy, but it can become complex and difficult to maintain as the application grows and changes over time.

 

On the other hand, Microservice architecture is an approach where the application is broken down into smaller, independent services that can communicate with each other through APIs. Each microservice is responsible for a specific business capability and can be developed, deployed, and scaled independently. This approach provides flexibility, scalability, and allows for faster innovation and release cycles. However, it can also add complexity in terms of managing the communication and coordination between the microservices.

Main differences between microservice architecture and monolithic architecture are:

• Monolithic architecture is a single, self-contained unit while microservice architecture is composed of smaller, independent services.
• In monolithic architecture, all functionalities are tightly integrated and dependent on each other while in microservice architecture, each service is responsible for a specific business capability.
• Monolithic architecture can be simpler to develop and deploy but can become complex and difficult to maintain while microservice architecture provides flexibility, scalability, and faster innovation but can add complexity in terms of managing communication and coordination between services.